Documentary filmmaker as historian Part II

As a follow up to yesterday’s entry about the documentary filmmaker being a historian, I consulted an actual book. I searched through my hard copy of Theorizing Documentary edited by Michael Renov. (The book can be found on Google Book Search, however page 25 is unavailable.)

Renov writes,

“This is perhaps the most elemental of documentary functions, familiar since the Lumières’ “actualités,” traceable to the photographic antecedent. The emphasis here is on the replication of the historical real, the creation of a second-order reality cut to the measure of our desire – to cheat death, stop time, restore loss… interest lies not so much in recovering time past or in simply chronicling daily life – there is little illusion of a pristine retrieval – as in seizing the opportunity to rework experience at the level of sound and image.”

The documentary filmmaker is a historian and curator for the past and present. Deciding what is worthy of curation, is part of the battle as it is for professional historians.

What is important, as brought up by Jonathan Fein’s “Objects and Memory,”
is that the appropriate objects are chosen to symbolize and represent history. Materials shown in a film, should trigger personal emotion and sentiment to viewers in order to be successful.

Advertisements

Leave a comment

Filed under Culture, documentary, People

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s